1-3
Although the military force structure has downsized considerably since the end of the
Gulf War, operational tempo has increased. A sampling of military operations include:
Operations Provide Comfort, Northern/Southern Watch (Iraq), Operation Provide
Promise and Operation Joint Endeavor in Bosnia and Herzegovina, humanitarian relief
operations in Operation Support Hope in Rwanda, Operation Restore Hope in Somalia,
Operation Allied Force in Kosovo, counter-drug Operations, and humanitarian aid for
disaster, flood, and other natural disasters, and most recently Operation Nobel Eagle and
Enduring Freedom. The DoD projects an increase in worldwide operations in support of
homeland security. To meet these obligations with the present force structure, the DoD
must increase its reliance on force multipliers such as increased automation, smarter
weapons, and near real-time situational awareness. These approaches require a far
greater reliance on rapid, sustained information transfer than in the past.
Growth in commercial wireless applications (i.e. cellular, Personal Communications
System, paging, mobile telephony, broadcast and others) worldwide has also placed
increasing pressures on DoD. Future military information superiority requirements
introduce technical developments in areas such as passive and active sensing, high-speed
data links, high-resolution radars, wideband mobile links, and antenna technology. Some
examples of such technical developments are the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and
network centric operations. UAVs can find, identify, and even direct precision munitions
to a target of interest. They can also collect and relay tactical and strategic intelligence.
Network centric operations enhance the common operating picture of the Warfighter with
tremendous improvements in information sharing made possible by networking. Because
of these desired capabilities, military systems find themselves sometimes in direct
competition for use of certain portions of the EM spectrum with commercial wireless
applications.
Congressionally mandated EM spectrum reallocations of some critical DoD’s EM
spectrum have challenged DoD and become a concern in terms of future EM spectrum
availability for operational training and testing. Title VI of the Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act (OBRA-93) required the Secretary of Commerce to provide at least
200 MHz of Government allocated EM spectrum for reallocation. Title III of the
Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (BBA 97) required that the Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) and National Telecommunications and Information Administration
(NTIA) identify for auction at least 120 MHz of additional EM spectrum (20 MHz of
which had to be “Government” EM spectrum). The loss of government EM spectrum has
reduced the flexibility critical to operations and training for the DoD. The prospect of
future reallocations only serves to exacerbate these problems. This has challenged DoD
to pursue proactive approaches that would prevent future erosion of critical government
EM spectrum and technologies that preserve the operational flexibility needed by
Warfighters to complete their mission.
This strategic plan establishes goals and objectives along with specific initiatives to
guide the DoD toward achieving its EM spectrum vision. The DoD EM spectrum and E3